In recognition of International Women’s Day 2021 this blog post explores how the benefit system can do more to support women, how it has impacted women during the pandemic, and how it can be changed to create a more equal benefit system.

At the start of the pandemic there was much talk that COVID-19 would prove to be the great equalizer of our time. After all, coronavirus can affect anyone, regardless of race, religion, class or gender. Yet the opposite has happened. Whilst the virus can infect anyone, the financial repercussions have not been equally felt across our society.

Since March 2020 one in three households have lost income as a result of the pandemic, nearly two in five people who’ve been affected by mental health problems have experienced a drop in income, and Universal Credit claims have risen from 2.4 million to 5.6 million in the past year.

The numbers are striking, and women make up one of the groups most deeply affected by the pandemic.

Austerity hit women twice as hard as men before the pandemic

In 2016 the Women’s Budget Group released analysis showing that austerity measures were expected to hit women twice as hard as men. They predicted that, with new austerity measures in place, by 2020 women would be £1,008 a year worse off on average, and low-income women as much £1,678 worse off. In contrast, men would be £555 a year worse off.

To compound this, there is still a huge issue around benefit take-up. Recent government figures show that over £10 billion of benefits is unclaimed each year, nearly half of which is unclaimed housing benefits (worth up to £4.2 billion). This means that over one million families are missing out on an average of £3,000 per year. The lack of benefit take-up across households has added to the adverse impact austerity measures have had on women. Even before the pandemic here was already stark gender inequality.

Forecasts assumed that the government would proceed with its planned changes to tax and benefits in the run-up to 2020, which included the full transition to Universal Credit. As we know, the pandemic has delayed many of these plans which has only served to further entrench this gender divide.

The pandemic has worsened the problems of our gendered benefit system

In March 2020 the world went through a seismic upheaval, akin to the outbreak of World War Two. In the UK, borders closed, hospitals were overrun, care homes were sealed shut, most universities converted to online teaching and homeschooling became the norm for children and parents nationwide. The impact on the economy has been severe and the government put in place certain provisions to protect UK citizens.

Unfortunately, the government’s supports did not thoroughly take into account the often complex nature of women’s lives or consider how the benefit system can do more to support women.

We know that women take on more familial caring responsibilities than men and make up 58% of all UK carers. We also know that there more women lone parents than men. This means that it is much more likely that women will be in part-time or lower paid work so they can accommodate these familial obligations.

In fact, a report on Women and the Economy from March 2020, commissioned by the House of Commons, found that 40% of all working women were in part-time roles, compared to 13% of working men. Therefore, whole swathes of women have been automatically excluded from the COVID-19 financial support schemes. Worryingly, this often includes exclusion from sick pay, meaning that women simply cannot afford to fall ill with the virus.

It is unsurprising, therefore, that more women are now entering the benefit system for the first time:

The reality is that the pandemic has pushed millions of people further into poverty, and women have formed a disproportionate number of this group. It is the design of a heavily gendered benefit system that allowed this to happen yet action can be taken to address how the benefit system can do more to support women.

Behind closed doors: emotional labour and domestic violence

When looking at the impact that Covid-19 is having on women it is important to also consider what is taking place in the privacy of the family home. The emotional labour women have done throughout the crisis has been monumental and the government’s order to stay at home put more women at risk of domestic violence than ever before. 

As schools closed and home-schooling becoming the norm working parents had to juggle childcare and child education alongside their own work. Certainly, home-schooling impacted fathers and mothers the world over, however, there is substantial evidence to suggest that women have been impacted to a greater degree than their male counterparts.

A study by University College London found that women spent twice as much time on home-schooling than men. They were also considerably more likely to have given up work than fathers with children of the same age to undertake these caring responsibilities. On the whole ONS data shows that women were more likely than men to report that their well-being had been affected during the pandemic.  

The order to stay home also led to a sharp rise in domestic violence. The United Nations’ report, The Shadow Pandemic: Violence against women during COVID-19, revealed how the pandemic has intensified violence against women in nearly every country, describing it quite aptly as the ‘shadow pandemic’. Exacerbating factors include security, health and money worries, cramped living conditions, isolation with abusers, movement restrictions and deserted public spaces.

Graphic to illustrate the factors that have led to the increase in domestic violence during Covid-19 pandemic for a blog post titled How the benefit system can do more to support women

Factors exacerbating domestic violence during the pandemic include security, health and money worries, cramped living conditions, isolation with abusers, movement restrictions and deserted public spaces. Source: United Nations Women.

The government put a number of policies in place to safeguard all victims of domestic violence. Victims were assured they would not face any legal repercussion for leaving their homes during the lockdown; £76 million was allocated to domestic abuse and sexual violence charities; and legal aid was made more accessible. However, the rapid increase in demand on domestic abuse services and charities meant that they were still stretched to breaking point. It is likely that society will be dealing with the repercussions of this in the years to come.

Our recommendations show how the benefit system can do more to support women

We recognise that these issues are deep-rooted and challenging to tackle. However, at Policy in Practice we have conducted research into important policy changes that could benefit women and society as a whole. Here are three ways that show how the benefit system can do more to support women.

1. Budget2021’s £20 uplift for a further six months is welcome but should be permanent

Our analysis shows that the £20 uplift is a first step on the path out of poverty for many:

  • Maintaining the £20 uplift to Universal Credit will shield 224,000 households and 229,000 children from hardship
  • The decision on the £20 uplift to Universal Credit should be looked at in conjunction with other welfare measures such as the two-child limit and the minimum income floor for self-employed households, and a four-year benefit freeze
  • The uplift serves as a financial and social investment in the UK’s economic recovery from the pandemic, boosting personal finances and people’s ability to put money back into their local economy

2. The benefit cap should be reconsidered

Astonishingly, single mothers make up 85% of all households affected by the Benefit Cap. DWP figures show that out of the 134,044 households that had support capped, single mothers accounted for 114,337 of them. Policy in Practice forecasted that benefit-capped households were set to double as a result of the Covid-19 supports, so the welcome increases in benefits were hitting a static benefit cap and not reaching the families who needed them. 

3. The two-child limit should be reconsidered

Our evidence to the Work and Pensions Committee found that:

  • The two-child limit will worsen child poverty: an estimated 266,000 will enter poverty due to the limit on tax credits
  • In-work households will be penalised: 70% of those at risk are in-work and they will face a higher average loss of income than out-of-work households
  • There may be unintended consequences on household behaviour

With women making up a large proportion of lone parents, this has had disastrous impacts on those households and has pushed more families further into poverty.

Helpful resources

Next steps

To find out more about Policy in Practice’s work join our free webinars:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.

Register for an upcoming webinar

TitleDateStart TimeDurationRegister
How the housing crisis has deepened the cost of living crisis For most people housing is the highest living cost, yet the ongoing housing crisis in the UK is often overlooked when discussing the current cost of living crisis.

This webinar will explore the policy issues affecting housing affordability for low-income households, examining the scale of the problem as well as what can be done in both the short and long term.

We will highlight important work done by our clients using data to proactively address housing issues.

We will be joined by a leading local authority to discuss a recent project conducted with Policy in Practice that used benefits administration data to identify households in temporary accommodation that could be helped to move into the private rental sector.

Join this webinar to learn:

- How UK housing policy interacts with the cost of living crisis
- How local authorities are using data to proactively tackle housing affordability problems
- Actions you can take now to support your residents dealing with housing issues alongside the cost of living crisis
27/7/202210:30 BST1.3 hours
Register
How to identify and support Just About Managing households using data The government has said it wants to make life easier for the 'squeezed middle' or people who are just about managing. These are the families who are not rich and they are also not those on the lowest incomes. Despite most being in work, they are struggling to meet their cost of living and it is no wonder.

The cost of living hit a 30-year high in February with inflation running at 6.2% and outpacing wage growth. Electricity bills were up nearly 20% in the year to January 2022, and gas bills by 28%, with further rises expected. Private rental prices across the UK went up by 2% in the year to January, the highest rate for five years; in the East Midlands that figure was 3.6%.

We know that one in five UK adults (10.3 million people) have less than £100 in savings, one in ten have no savings at all and more than a quarter have less than £500. Many are one broken appliance away from slipping into debt.

Local authorities want to help families who are struggling now to avoid a crisis down the line yet they have little or no visibility over people who are not already claiming benefits. Now though, analysis of other datasets can be used to get a clearer picture of families who are just about managing.

Join this webinar to learn:

- Who is just about managing now but at risk in the future due to the rising cost of living
- Which datasets can be used to identify families in danger of debt
- How local authorities can target support to avert crisis
21/9/202210:30 BST1.3 hours
Register
Menu
Skip to content
%d bloggers like this: