Nutritionist Anika Knueppel argues against cutting benefits for obese people.

Nutritionist Anika Knueppel argues against cutting benefits for obese people.

Earlier this week it was reported that David Cameron asked an adviser to the Department of Health to review the effects of cutting benefits for overweight people, among others.

In an interview with the BBC, Minister Mark Harper clarified that the goal was to encourage people to engage in available treatment to get them back into work.

I am a nutritional scientist and PhD student at University College and was asked by Policy in Practice for my views.

As a nutritional scientist I am outraged by this idea, since the idea of singling out benefit recipients for being overweight contradicts everything I read and believe in.

The policy implies that people are not working because of their obesity and worse, that they choose to stay obese to not get into work. I think this is highly questionable. I am in favour of interventions that target whole communities.

Would a financial incentive, or in this case a financial disincentive through a benefit sanction, have a positive effect?

Analysis from 2009 and a systematic review from 2007 conclude not so much – though financial incentives such as taxes can have an effect on tobacco and alcohol consumption.

The evidence indicates that it might be more successful to consider taxes on unhealthy foods. Therefore all people regardless of their current weight and employment status would benefit.

Obese individuals are already victims of discrimination in their daily life.

Current research shows, that stigmatisation and bullying does not motivate people to lose weight, it actually increases unhealthy behaviours like binge eating or decreases physical exercise.

Forcing people into weight loss programmess or even bariatric surgery by cutting their benefits – sounds like stigmatisation and bullying to me and therefore might hurt more than help.

Last year, researchers at the University of Cambridge published a paper stating that healthy eating is actually 3 times more expensive than unhealthy food in Britain.

Cutting benefits would make it even harder to eat healthily and physical activity alone is not enough.

The proposal would target lower socio-economic groups, as evidence in the Marmot Review.

It showed that people with lower social status were more prone to obesity. This potential policy could have a detrimental effect on those targeted and be especially tough on families.

I conclude – if the government wants to tackle obesity – have a look at the beautiful graph published by THE LANCET at the bottom of this post, which shows how governments can support healthy food choices.

But I recommend separating efforts to tackle obesity from any policies regarding the welfare system.

Obesity is a condition with many different causes based on genetics and the environment. Interventions have to try to look at the individual in terms of their psychosocial well-being, physical activity and diet to be effective.

The NHS offers good support and helpful recommendations for people struggling with weight loss. Local councils also run programmes to support children and their parents, and take a preventative approach to tackling obesity.

Overall the target should be to change health behaviours across communities, namely diet and physical activity.

But individual success, failure and even the drive to start some kind of change could have a wide range of reasons – there is no “one size fits all”.

Anika Knueppel


Read the full Lancet Obesity 2015 series: The Lancet: Obesity 2015

, , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.

Register for an upcoming webinar

TitleDateStart TimeDurationRegister
Reducing barriers to work using data led campaigns In September 2023 the UK experienced an economic inactivity rate of 21.3% and an estimated unemployment rate of 4.3%, both of which have increased compared to previous data. Economic inactivity has surpassed pre-pandemic levels, prompting government efforts to integrate this group into the workforce.

Historically, policies under Universal Credit and legacy benefits emphasised pushing people into employment through conditionality and short term measures. Today, both major political parties are exploring ways to facilitate return to work and eliminate barriers to employment. However, the government is also extending conditionality and adopting a tougher stance on sanctions for a broader range of people.

Haringey is home to a young, ethnically diverse population. In June 2023, almost one fifth of those between 16 to 65 were on Universal Credit. Nearly 7% of residents over 16 were claiming unemployment related benefits, a figure above the London average of 4.7% and the 3rd highest rate of all UK councils

Haringey Council wanted to find ways to overcome barriers to employment for young people and families with children and has used data to achieve success with its employment support programmes.

Join this webinar to learn:

- The new carrot and stick policy changes designed to break down barriers to work and reduce economic inactivity
- What Haringey Council did to increase take up of free childcare for two year olds to 70%
- How Haringey Council successfully helped 95 NEETs on their employment journey

With guest speakers from Haringey Council
29/11/202310:30 GMT1.3 hours
Policy review of 2023 and what 2024 may hold Join our last webinar of 2023 to hear our policy analysts review 2023's policy changes and big issues, from the ongoing cost of living and energy crises to the funding of local government and the Autumn Statement.

We will highlight our policy findings from the year including our work that revealed that millions of households across the UK are missing out on £19 billion of support each year.

We'll look at the role that data is playing in helping leading organisations to tackle these issues.

Through case studies of different types of households we'll look at what the changes mean for families now, and what 2024 has in store.

Along the way we'll share the positive impact that organisations we work with ​are having, and give practical solutions that others can adopt.
6/12/202310:30 GMT1.3 hours
How the debt sector is connecting people to support31/1/202410:30 GMT1.3 hours
Skip to content
%d bloggers like this: